What The Actual Fuck- - Blog Posts
Hey guys, I normally don't do these sorts of posts but
Artists beware!
There's this guy going around, asking mainly tadc artists to do commissions for him (usually its digital circus x hunterxhunter manga redraw), and if they refuse he'll spam slurs and insults, make alt accounts to demand the artist to finish the art He's prob just a troll (cause I refuse to believe ppl like him are real lol), so it's best to just block him and don't interact
his current @ here: jinbe-the-shipweight (previously jimbei-the-son-of-the-sea) twitter: originally ToesGeo but changed his name to Kick_Ass785 (still shows up in search if you type ToesGeo) bsky: I don't think he has a permanent account on there, but usually his @ are themaxx(+numbers), kick-ass, or something crude here's some messages me and other artists got from him (cw for slurs and generally unpleasant behavior):
this is what he sent to me:
***
cartuneslover23 (twitter)
***
his tumblr:
his twitter:
SEASON 1-3 FIVE WOULD NEVER š£ļøš£ļø
I just finished the episode āTick Tockā of Bridgerton and what the actual FUCK. It wasn't THAT bad but Eloise ?!?
I'm sorry but āI wish I could do something" girl ?!? You're telling me you can't help ? Can't talk about it to your family? Mind you nothing would be my priority but helping a girl get out of a marriage with a seventy years old man.
"and the more that i am in pain, the more that you'll gain. and, to me, that seems like a pretty fair trade!" so me
Nah wordddd.!!!!!!!!!!
tbh i feel like donald trump is exactly who christopher columbus and the other white guys who colonized America would want to rule in the land they came to and that is SICK. things like that should never happen in 21st century or ever
please, just let my guy get dicked down by someone he lovesš
I don't want to sound pretentious but if I remember correctly Yoshida said Ash and Eiji would had end up having sexual intercouse and Ash being on the bottom side.
And its great, tbh. Its great and its hot and its beautiful. So I dont get why the fandom tries to hide it or avoid the topic when there is even a oficial art of Ash in bed sleeping naked next to Eiji.
It's not necessarily bad to sexualize a character based on canonical stuff, much less because having been sexually abused has nothing to do with consensual love.
World's most moral army's most noble soldiers...
How do you drag Batman out of a deep magical mind control? Apparently YOU FAKE MURDER HIS BABY BOY IN FRONT OF HIM, like I am winning at the comics I'm reading but AT WHAT COST, Christ on a fucking cracker.
ā¼ļøā¼ļøSPOILERSā¼ļøā¼ļø
There is NO WAY that the Buck-misses-Eddie-so-much-that-he-lives-in-his-empty-house-writers were fucking right????
WHAT THE FUCK. WHAT. THE FUCK YALL.
You have GOT to be FUCKING KIDDING ME.
there is no way.
THERE IS NO FUCKING WAY.
WHAT THE FUCK.
WHAT THE FUCK???
You have GOT to be FUCKING KIDDING ME.
there is no way.
THERE IS NO FUCKING WAY.
WHAT THE FUCK.
WHAT THE FUCK???
I WAS ONLY O. TUMBLR FOR LIKE 5 SECS YESTERDAY WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK IS A BOOP ?!?!?!???!!?????????!!!!!
I've just learned about villeroni and I'll be sobbing in my bed if anyone asks.
I'm gonna collapse on the floor and sob hysterically
maxiel x 2023 season - āI knew you'd come back to meā
(please don't repost)
You said it. āš»
another day another what the fuck
If ur looking through the christmas tag for happy jolly posts scroll past this
scrolling throught Ao3 (as one does) occasionally seeing smut (as one does) Finding out that there is rudolph the red nosed god damn reindeer smut on ao3 (AS ONE DOES??????) Reading the tags and finding out that is was also incest... (AS. ONE. DOES.)
So, apparently...
today i found out that victor hugo has had more sex than possibly almost any other human that has lived on this planet.Ā
he had so much sex his biographers straight up gave up trying to document all of his sexual partners. he was reported to fuck up to 3-9 times a day. He had a secret sex diary written in code. He hadĀ āofficialā andĀ āunofficialā mistresses. One estimate was that he had ~200 sexual partners in two years.Ā
Icon.Ā
10000 likes!
I FEEL LIKE I'VE BEEN HERE FOR LIKE A WEEK, WDYM 10K?!?!?
THIS WASNT ON THE BINGO CARD
mclarenās cheerleaders
wym my life depends on me??? iām responsible for myself??? im in charge of myself? i have to make decisions for myself?!? ME??!!!
friendly reminder that people canonically fuck spiders in the sp universe
X-Men people how are we doing
I personally am not ok.
No because I was planning to watch Supernaturals and then I just found out that apparently people ACTUALLY shipped Sam and Dean??!!
Like, what the fuck is wrong with you? I know that y'all's only excuse will be "this is just fiction," "Get over it, it's not that deep I'm a pro shipper," or even worse, "It's not hurting anybody" oh my god you guys are so sick what the fuck. What in the world....people actually liking to ship two brothers truly surprised and horrified me beyond my comprehension. Please GET HELP IMMEDIETLY.
I took a look at the #wincest tag and literally what the fuck...???
Idk how ANYONE dares say its real? Like bro wtf?
Why are you admitting to liking incest?
Why are you proud to ship two brothers together?
Especially after that one episode where they called dean/sam shippers out when they found out about the spn books
I saw a comment say they just choose to ignore the destiel moments after s3 and the 'wincest chemistry' is still there.
Im literally sick to my stomach i didnt know people were fr about this shit
I filtered the tag and will spend the rest of my life ignoring it for my own mental health
This FUCKING picture of schlatt made me WEAK IM DROPPING OUT. I GOTTA GO I GOTTA GO I GOTTA GET THE FUCK OUT OF HERE
SCREAMING WITHOUT THE S ON GOD!
Edit: https://youtu.be/XxNsi0UVbCg (2:10 ;))
I downloaded the book Unhumans: The secret history of communist revolutions (and how to stop them) by Jack Posobiec. (Thanks oceanofpdf.) This is the book that the current USA Vice President wrote a blurb for, so I expected it to have its finger on the pulse of the current fascist ideology in USA.
The thesis is like this: Communists, leftists, progressives, and revolutionaries in general are "unhumans:" zombie-like, hollow shells of people with rabies-style senseless violence and hatred toward civilization and order.
The book proposes essentially that leftist ideology is worthless to engage with, because it does not exist. The Left is purely driven by hatred and jealousy of people it characterizes as oppressors, and this manifests in a completely nihilistic urge to kill and destroy.
The book opens with this melodramatic meditation on Darkness and Light, the opposing forces of beauty, truth and goodness versus ugliness, lies and badness. These "good" and "bad" forces are eternal, and the "bad" force is kept in check by "civilization."
"Communism" is a manifestation of the "bad" force. Key to the book's argument is an apparent presumption that human society is meritocratic. Though the book acknowledges that yes, Russian peasants had miserable lives and good reason to be resentful towards the tsar, it seems to show that people who revolt against "oppressors" or the more powerful are acting according to the "bad" force, by seizing power through violence rather than "earning" it.
I don't think the author is saying that all human societies have had merit-based systems of upward social mobility; I think he just thinks that seizing power or property through revolt and societal upheaval is always bad because it isn't "earned," regardless of whether a mechanism to "earn" exists.
Which is where we get to the weird part. Much of the book is a retelling of history, specifically various revolutionary movements including the French, Russian, and Haitian revolutions and the end of apartheid in South Africa.
The author seems to characterize revolutionary movements as generally bad. "Well, how was the American Revolution different?" one wonders. The book doesn't answer this at length. In fact, it doesn't have a chapter or subchapter dedicated to the American Revolution the way it does with other revolutions.
Here is a quote from page 31:
...this ubiquitous belief that no one culture or society is better than another so canāt we all just get along. And yet no country or people on earth lived in such a way naturally for all of history. When mass migration dilutes and unbalances a shared culture, there is one force alone powerful enough to hold it all together: an all-powerful state at the center. Only great empires have maintained multiple ethnic groups living within their borders simultaneously, keeping everyone in line with the overwhelming power of the emperorās unyielding hand. These were not republics with civil liberties and equal standing for all classes. It is unlikely a republic could exist in such a condition.
From here, he explains that white Americans share a common culture because they all assimilated into an American culture derived from "western civilization", and then swerves into talking about how George Floyd died from a drug overdose actually and bringing in illegal immigrants is a communist plot to tear America apart.
He does not appropriately deal with the shocking meaning of his argument: that a multi-ethnic or multi-cultural nation cannot exist without authoritarian tyranny. This is an amazing departure from the fundamental narrative of the USA's values (whether that narrative is true or not).
By his own admission, either the USA must cease to be a democracy and become an authoritarian autocracy, or the USA must get rid of everyone who isn't a single race, ethnicity and culture, and both of those things are fundamentally contradictory to the Constitution and arguably to the conception of the USA.
The book's proposals for "what to do" to defeat the "unhumans" are pretty anemic and in line with what conservatives are already doing. Unhumans is nothing new in terms of racism and white supremacist ideology; it keeps these things implied in its warped idea of history and the core concept of total dehumanization of anyone and everyone left of hunting the homeless for sport. The book explicitly states that it does not advocate violence, and also explicitly states that this is to prevent "leftists" from using that as a criticism against the book.
I think the author genuinely could be against violence, or at least any violence that isn't directly carried out by the state, but he is also overwhelmingly clear that being a "leftist" is essentially rabies: "leftists" have ceased to be human, they hate all that is human and all that is good, and they systematically work toward destruction as an end in itself.
Unhumans has simple ideas and simple writing, almost to the point of being condescending. It reads like children's books written by adults who are out of touch with children's intelligence and ability to think for themselves. Its worship of Elon Musk as one of the "great men" of history leads to some hysterically funny lines. But I'm afraid it would seem like a great book to someone who doesn't read books.
The first chapter, in particular, is perfectly formulated to appear grounded in wisdom, history and fact to someone who hasn't read anything since high school. It uses a lot of famous quotes on government and democracy, and cites Aristotle and other "big names" in Western thought.
But it doesn't want to introduce its readers to new ideas: it repeatedly urges readers to listen to their automatic and instinctive reactions to the text, saying "You're right" or "You're onto something." It reassures readers of what they "already know," telling them that their gut feelings are correct and any information that might have caused them discomfort or dissonance is part of the communist plot.
I'm not sure what conclusions to draw from all of this. I'll have to think about it more.